|
|
4th World
Social Forum |
India 2004 |
Political Bodies:
New Emancipatory struggles to promote a radical democracy
Radical democracy must focus on democratization not only of
political area but also of social life itself.
In the past few years, emerging and/or reemerging political
bodies brought subjects into the political agenda that were either never present
in public debate or were never presented as radically as they currently are. The
diversity of the issues presented by those individuals and the diversity of
structure of political organizations lead us to consider that the actual object
of democratization is the organization of social life as a whole.
In respect of political area, such democratization is placed
in several levels and its main demand is the acknowledgement of the various
individuals and issues they defend. Said acknowledgement is directly linked to a
break with the conservative tradition, whose political approach gives main
importance to the different ways of participation and does not recognize the
several conflict and social contradictions areas existing within society.
Inclusion of these new political bodies takes place in a
public area which is still full of inequalities. The public area, in its State
dimension as well as in other levels, where political conflicts are also
developed, is still constituted as a social space within which gender, casts,
race, generation and sexual repression inequalities, etc. are present. The
diversity of political bodies as part of the current democracy context reveals
oppressions and power abuse that were naturalized in society structures.
Consequently, it is important to perceive, within that dialectical movement,
where democracy presses forward in terms of radicalism and where do innovation
factors lie, and which are the political practices that maintain or bring back
old forms of domination.
Understanding the relationship between sexuality,
reproduction and production as issues pertaining to material and symbolic levels
of the social relations of exploitation and domination is an analytic demand
brought by the politicization of the various dimensions of social conflict
revealed by social movements. That is to say that the production and wealth
accumulation, repression and sexual discrimination relationships and the
reproduction model do not constitute social life dimensions of monopoly but, on
the contrary, they are constituent elements of a specific social structure.
Dissociation among those areas and between those areas and
politics is a requirement of the capitalist and patriarchal power system that,
by fragmenting and dissociating those different dimensions, weakens the
resistance strategies. The unequal cast, race and gender relationships are
reproduced and maintained from a power system based on the articulated creation
of those inequalities in relation with the different social life areas already
mentioned, consequently producing a fragmented perception of the problems.
Standing against that system is, in the first place, to acknowledge the various
forms of inequalities and discriminations and their tangles.
According to Varikas, concerning the origin of contemporary
feminist movement: "the strength of that movement lied mostly in its insistence
on the
structural character of
domination manifested in daily life relationships, whose political nature has
precisely been denied. It was not about opposing "mentalities" to "institutions",
but basically about evidencing that domination was, at the same time, hidden and
reproduced by means of powerful institutions as the family, the sexed separation
between public and private, the institutionalized heterosexuality, the sexed
division and structure of work and jobs, etc."
Feminism, from the very beginning, considers control over
body and sexuality as a field of analysis and political struggle. It is a
feminism legacy to reveal the suffering and the violence exerted on women’s
bodies and different forms of sexual repression, which results in a more radical
and more human conception of social transformation.
Perspective of creation of a radical democracy with
citizenship is directly connected to politicization of social conflicts, to an
identification of mechanisms of social structure control and reproduction that
maintain and reproduce the inequalities and discriminations, and a strategic
policy where a collective action is based, at the same time, on the alliance and
capacity of facing conflicts and on translation of languages and senses of each
movement, in order to allow the intelligibility between the various collective
individuals and the capacity of gathering struggles and keeping autonomy.
According to Francisco de Oliveira (1998), construction of
citizenship and democracy is an endless process because, at the precise moment
that citizen and democratic acquisitions are confirmed, the task of expanding
already achieved limits restarts. That restart, according to him, must seek the
expansion of the already acquired, and must not be mistaken with "eternal return,
tireless and hopeless". In this respect, it shall be emphasized that secular
State is one of the basic achievements of modern democracy. From the point of
view of the emancipating struggles and the current world context this is the
objective that has to be relocated as value and as a struggle field for its
realization as the essential condition of democratic life. Politicization
concerning reproduction and sexuality areas represents a fundamental
contribution of the feminist movement, in this dialectical process of creating
new values for democracy and citizenship, and, simultaneously, of fighting on
what turns up to be a new paradigm of individual freedom and life model. In
considering reproductive and sexual life as citizenship areas, a new additional
perspective towards creation of a more fair and egalitarian society is opened.
Women’s sex and body are the main target on which pleasure market and life
trivialization industry is most strongly focused. It is also in this area where
the repressive power of churches place all its influence on social life control,
even as a strategy of maintenance and expansion of political power.
Feminists brought about reflections and political actions
into the sexuality and reproduction areas, which led to the creation of a new
field of rights -reproductive and sexual rights that integrate the events so
experienced as part of the citizenship. That is a fundamental matter for
democracy in terms of expansion of the egalitarian relationships to other areas
of social life, which at the same time contributes to the transformation of the
real meaning of equality.
Constructing citizenship for women and men requires the
creation of new symbols that promote a world representation where solidarity and
freedom senses prevail. Thus, it is necessary on the one hand to combat dominant
logic that, apart from producing social poverty and exclusion, simplifies the
sense of life and reduces citizens to consumers, and on the other hand to create
new egalitarian enchantments that bring new meaning to sense of social justice
and cheer up the democratic struggle around it.
Coordinated by
Articulación Feminista Marcosur
|
 |