|
|
|
4th World
Social Forum |
India 2004 |
A round table proposed by National Network of Autonomous
Women’s Groups-India, Development Alternative for Women in New Era [DAWN],
Articulacion Feminista Marcosur and WICEJ.
A Dialogue between Movements
The tremendous challenges, posed by the forces and ideology
of the right wing and neo liberal economics, have moved many progressive
movements to ally and forge alliances. There is also an ideological basis for
such alliances. We have realised that though movements claim to bring together
a particular group on the basis of some identity, people live several
identities and respond to them in different ways. With the challenge presented
by women of colour to the white women’s movement, the women’s movement
realised in the 1970s and 80s, that there were serious limitations to using a
single category of women for analysis and strategising. Similarly, the labour
movement had seen the analytical category of ‘class’ being argued and battered.
In the globalised world, the easy divide between the formal and informal
sectors and employer-worker relationships had collapsed. And dalit men who
have often spoken about the advantaged dalits were confronted with a dalit
women’s movement. The persistent challenge has been to understand how we can
accept the politics of differences and the notion of conflicting and multiple
identities as well as build strategies for social justice and equality.
The race and gender challenge and its theorisation
dovetailed with the post modernist trends to bring to centrestage the problems
of a single category. Were there two genders, man and woman based on biology
and were there only two sexes? Very soon the social groups of transgendered
persons and bisexuals were introduced. There were problems within a category.
Women have multiple and complex identities as workers, dalits or lower caste
women, as members of religious groups, based on ethnicity or race, because of
their sexual orientation, as trafficked women or prostitutes and so on. Along
with multiple identities there are multiple discriminations. Racial
discrimination and a disadvantaged position in the labour market are quite
different for men and women.
The multiple identities approach puts forward the concept
of differences between members of a group. Some face a variety of
discriminations, some are more privileged than others in certain contexts and
situations. In the case of women, there is a legitimacy of articulating
oppression vis a vis patriarchal society but that oppression is layered and
complex for different women. By and large, feminists and activists of the
women’s movement have accepted the starting premise that women live
multiple and layered identities, which are derived from social relations
within in a patriarchal and unequal society. This has lead to experimentation
with different analytical frameworks and methodologies. This workshop is a
continuation of the ongoing debate and an attempt to build bridges between
movements.
The framework of intersectionality explores the
relationship between the multiple dimensions of social identities and social
relations. This methodology seeks to conceptualise the racial, ethnic,
economic, sexual, cultural and gender dimensions of multiple and even
compounding forms of discriminations. It has been used to visibilise groups
within groups e.g. roma women or transgendered persons. It has made a singular
contribution in highlighting the intersection of identities in individuals in
different categories. For example, during right wing provoked violence, women
may not be killed but are usually raped as the property of the "other" men as
in Gujerat and Rwanda. Sterilisation or clinical trials are performed
routinely on black, Hispanic and Third World women. Structural Adjustment
Programs hit different types of workers in various ways, and men and women of
different classes are impacted by cuts or rollback in governmental social
sector expenditure in a variety of ways.
Workshop Design
The workshop ‘A Dialogue Between Movements’ is visualised
as a talk show with a moderator, representatives or experts and a
participatory audience. The moderator will open the workshop with a short
introduction on the objectives, process and importance of connections between
movements. Representatives of four movements: the women’s movement, the labour
movement, the gay rights movement and the dalit/race movement will present how
they have taken up the issues of violence, work, religious fundamentalism and
access to decision making/power and what sort of problems they have
encountered in doing so. The audience also drawn from members of the four
movements will have the opportunity to intervene on all the issues.
In Round One,
each of the representatives of the 4 movements will get 5 minutes each to
speak on their intervention on the issue of violence. Followed by audience
comments.
In Round Two,
each rep. will speak on the issue of work. Followed by audience comments.
In Round Three,
each rep. will speak on the issue of religious fundamentalism. Followed by
audience comments.
In Round Four,
each rep. will speak on the issue of access to decision making/power. Followed
by audience comments.
Round Five
will encourage the articulation of strategies within the four movements and
alliances to seek human rights for all oppressed peoples.
Coordinated by NNAWG
National Network of Autonomous Women’s Group
|
 |
|
 |
|